It shows the narrators development as a character. By using sarcasm, Orwell wanted to maximize the mess environment of the prison. In terms of responsibility, as colonial officers, all of the characters perform their jobs in an impersonal way. The prisoner leftovers inert as guards bind his arms and demonstration him to the scaffold, followed by the collected officials. A dog that appeared from nowhere was the only one to show sympathy for the prisoner while the men continued with their normal lives immediately after the execution, as nothing happened. Orwell's vivid descriptions of the setting, the people, and most importantly the mood surrounding the story are stark and memorable.
After having completed his education, Orwell joined the Indian Imperial Police, and served in Burma, from 1922 to 1927, as an Assistant Superintendent of Police. At a word from Francis the two warders, gripping the prisoner more closely than ever, half led, half pushed him to the gallows and helped him clumsily up the ladder. In his last moments, the prisoner started chanting the name of his Lord Rama. I am now getting more familiar with his trademark. Orwell wants everyone to rely on the Inner Party as their government.
While nobody believed him, they still gave a hearty laugh. This is because his emotions change along with the other guards since they all laugh together to cover their real emotions that they dont want to show to their fellow co-workers. A sickly light, like yellow tinfoil, was slanting over the high walls into the jail yard. Imagery consists of descriptive words and phrases that re-create sensory experiences for the reader. But to me was all about Orwell as the reluctant representative of Empire and the only one allowed to bear arms, being forced into doing what the Indians wanted against his will. To the superintendent and the prison guards, the execution of prisoners was just like any other routine job that they ought to complete so that they could move to the next responsibilities.
These questions are also important to the story specifically, because it shows how the narrator develops as a character and how this change also affects the theme of the story. Best remembered for his twin satires on totalitarianism, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell was a major participant in the British socialist movement. The story is set in a prison during the early twentieth century in Burma. What made everything look very comic was that while the man was in no way trying to resist he was still being guarded by six tall guards which also showed he must be a prisoner of stature. Suddenly, the wrongness of the entire act dawned upon him. The Hindu can be viewed as a dynamic character, as we see the change in tone when he is about to be hung, as he shows his religious faith and desperateness.
The Hangman has the most crucial step in performing the hanging, he is the end effector of the capital punishment. Can a dog be more human than humans themselves? At a point Orwell realises that his duty was against his values when he sees that they are going to cut off a life in full tide. All the organs of his body were working - bowels digesting food, skin renewing itself, nails growing, tissues forming - all toiling away in solemn foolery. This will help me to not just become. He is indifferent by what he sees, until he observes the fated man avoid avoiding a pond as he is frog-marched to the scaffold.
His portrayal of the settings especially add charm to his work. All kinds of crazy thoughts must be coming to his mind. Theme The theme of 'The Hanging' is of a dystopia-type earth which has been shattered by war, deceit, and, of course, the Party. Throughout his essay the author shows, that the are treated like animals. After, the prisoner steps carefully around the puddle the narrator says, I saw the mystery, the unspeakable wrongness, of cutting life short when it is in full tide pg 440. In my opinion, Orwell used symbolism, imagery, sarcasm and description.
It iss not always so — oah, no! How bad it was to cut a life short when it was in full tide. Evidence of this is found in the story, where he talks about how he and the other magistrates followed behind the prisoner and descries it as a procession pg 439. Orwell's essay begins with a tone of discernible detachment. In this essay, Orwell illustrates his disapproval of capital punishment by giving an example of the execution of a Hindu man, of which he was an observer, giving details of the events that occurred before and following the execution. However, warders are not caring about the death penalty.
The narrator Orwell, presumably is a part of the police force, but doesn't play an active role in the execution, other than the holding of the dog, but we are treated to his description of events, and to hear One of Orwell's short essays - set in Burma, where Orwell spent time an an Imperial Policeman, when Burma was in British control. His eyes saw the yellow gravel and the grey walls, and his brain still remembered, foresaw, reasoned — reasoned even about puddles. He walked clumsily with his bound arms, but quite steadily, with that bobbing gait of the Indian who never straightens his knees. The dog was difficult to control and the superintendent was angry. These were the condemned men, due to be hanged within the next week or two. The dog is a round character that represents loyalty and hope in the story. I let go of the dog, and it galloped immediately to the back of the gallows; but when it got there it stopped short, barked, and then retreated into a corner of the yard, where it stood among the weeds, looking timorously out at us.