Italy and Oman have implemented mandatory rotation for all listed companies in the past. This means that most firms gratify their auditors for the sole purpose of keeping them in the game. In the Italian mandatory audit firm rotation environment, the highest level of earnings management is found in periods after a mandatory rotation Cameran et al. Some view it as advantageous while others deem it as a detrimental in the company operations and the corresponding flexibility. Did they respond to all questions? Throughout the period of review, examination, and introspection on the causes and solutions to the latest financial crisis, the auditors have stayed well above the fray.
On the other hand, opponents of mandatory rotation argue that the knowledge acquired by an auditor about the specifics of a company will be lost with each rotation, ultimately harming audit quality. At the same time, rotations are often used for negotiating lower average costs per hour of audit work, as shown in the Italian mandatory audit firm rotation environment Barton, 2002. For starters, the selection process involves a significant amount of attention by the audit committee and management, not to mention the audit firms bidding for the work. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Otherwise, lower-cost auditing is the worst choice for auditors. On the other hand, clients with short audit tenures believe they can persuade their position in case of a disagreement Iyer and Rama, 2004. For example, if long-term relationships result in better earnings quality, the assumption is that the knowledge that auditors gain over time must trump the threats that the relationship poses to their skepticism.
However, focusing on ex-Arthur Andersen clients with extreme discretionary accruals, switching to a different auditor did not significantly improve financial reporting quality Blouin et al. For instance, audit quality and auditor independence are extremely difficult to measure. Frederick Kibbedi March 21, 2017 This is an amazing revelation which should spell increased audit quality as the world now embraces the new auditors report. They had to make choices that were analogous to choices both clients and managers regularly make. They also agreed to cap non-audit services at 70%. How a board comes out on the decision on the rotation of auditors depends on how the directors collectively weigh each of the factors. Many auditors were fired over rising Sarbanes-Oxley fees and some companies switched from Big 4 to next tier, some multiple times, chasing lower fees and on them.
© 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. In Germany in 1995, two years after the near collapse of the Metallgesellschaft Group, the German Central Bank promoted a five-year auditor rotation period, with little success. This is in the wake of government watchdogs and policy makers all over the globe examining lessons from the economic crisis and considering upgrading to better care for the investors. He thinks this is one of the reasons why firms are no longer quoting a reduced fee as a tactic to win the audit. For example, Chi and Huang 2005 find such a cut-off after five years of audit tenure, and findings by Davis et al. Important Note: Please read our website.
Given the lack of evidence associating mandatory audit firm rotation with an improvement on audit quality, regulators need to determine carefully the long-term objectives of a mandatory rotation requirement before implementing a costly measure. A stakeholder and research review such as this one relies on previously expressed views and published research and merely provides an overview of the major findings. In a separate piece of research, the benefit of joint audits were further scrutinised, finding no evidence related to audit quality and in fact stating that such audits actually cost more. Subsequently the European Parliament is currently discussing a rotation period of 21 years; however, thus far, no final decision has been taken on this issue. Compared to the ratings agencies, the auditors have gotten away with murder. Participants in the experiment interacted with one another in anonymous pairs over a computer network.
While they say goodbye to long-standing audit clients and work to win others, they need to consider what else they can — or cannot — do for the companies they audit. Smart Business spoke with Van Benschoten about best practices for auditor rotation, including the benefits and drawbacks. The idea is that rather than allowing companies to retain the same auditor forever, companies would be required to change auditors every say seven years Discuss the pros and cons of mandatory audit firm rotation What is your point of view on this topic If you can please not quote papers from a website called student papers something like that. Instead, these and other countries adopted audit partner rotation as an alternative measure to enhance audit quality. David Piercey University of Massachusetts — Amherst December 15, 2015 As new auditor rotation mandates are debated and adopted or rejected worldwide, a new research study takes a different approach to assessing the effects of these mandates on audit quality.
Companies may keep bidding audit work out, believing that an audit firm provides a lower price for new clients in hopes of gaining additional work. They do not, however, adequately deal with the issue of firm independence. Whether there is mandatory audit firm rotation or not, there is often mandatory audit partner rotation in most jurisdictions. Impact of auditor rotation Public companies in the European Union will soon be required to rotate auditor firms every 10 years with certain exceptions. The first year of a new auditor being in place is always a little bit trying for both the auditor and auditee as they learn what each one expects. Our firm offers optional partner rotation, though it is rarely requested by our clients. We wish to acknowledge some of the limitations of this paper.