We must know that zoos sabotage natural order and natural life cycle of different species Government should build wildlife sanctuaries where people can see wild animals with the help of guided jungles safaris. Lets say if an animal was sick in the wild nine times out of ten they would die or be killed by a predator but if an animal got sick in the zoo it will have a more likely chance of survival because of vetinarians on standby. From my perspective, animals should be kept in the zoo instead of leaving them in natural habitat. Additionally, the most famous reality shows worldwide are big brother and Idols; these two are examples of scripted and well rehearsed reality shows. If it breaks it creates permanent disorder in its flight. Hence, surveillance technology should be used to track people. The Garden of Intelligence was an enormous zoo which was full of different kind of animals and lots of ancient statues.
You can use individual words but be careful. The body of the essay draft must be. Strong arguments exist in favor of both points of view. What if the species becomes extinct in the wild? Zoo keepers either aren't aware of these signs themselves, or they aren't eager to explain them to us. Should animals be kept in zoos!? After being kicked out of a radio station for talking about.
Should a just government provide health care to its citizens? For hundreds of years people have gone to zoos in seek of entertainment. But how can they perform that when they have not been in contact with other creatures and how can they jump and run quickly without the having to hunt before? Zoos have many educational benefits. Alternatives would always be welcome in order to ensure that animals in captivities are not deprived of the life they should be having. If truly animals were kept to avoid extinction, then we would have conservatories dedicated for that purpose. It is a topic that divides an opinion. As a study, a cigarette contains seven thousand chemicals, but about two hundred of them are substances and toxics which cause health detriments.
It can be useful in triggering a passion for science in young children, making them eager to learn and better in school. While visitors laughed and have fun looking at these animals and walking around the zoo, the animals remained bounded inside a cage, like accused criminals. Zoos have been a place for human entertainment since such a long time that it is now widely considered a tradition, giving the pleasure of a wholesome family activity. The purpose was to keep the animals in touch with nature. They believe that the negatives of smoking far outweigh the positives. Animals that are usually the prey would be safe from being hunted by their predators whereas predator animals such as lions would not have died due to starvation. There are many people in many nations who.
It is obvious that animals can not be given the same rights as humans, since that would indicate that animals must also be held to the same standards, have the same duties, and receive the same punishments as humans, but animals can at least be given respect and kindness as any other life… They tend to live longer in zoos Animals live longer in zoos than they do in the wild they get the necessary care and food they need to live a very healthy lifestyle. Those people who wish to keep smoking legal argue that banning it is infringing on Canadians freedom of choice. Animals are more protected and cared in Zoos than anywhere else. Animals are naturally born and bred to live and die in wilderness habitats. What the test may cover.
Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers. On the other hand, there are more convincing arguments in favor of banning zoos. Is Casper the friendly ghost really that bad of a look? It is mainly visited for their endangered species of tigers. Animals in the zoo should have the every right to be able to do what they want and to be free, but the zoos just have to ruin it. You are welcome to search free essays. Zoos have research programs that help expand our knowledge about animals, especially the endangered species.
Zoos help educate people so they understand the need for conservation both for the animals and the plants. The information gained by these programs can help protect, and treat the species in the wild, as well as determine what affects if any climate change may have on the regions needed for the species to flourish. Health statistics prove that in Ireland in 2006 the precentage of people smoking 30% remained unchanged. Through this, probably a better regulation among zoos will achieved that would be beneficial to all parties involved. The general public interested in seeing animals can go on guided jungle safaris. For a flightless owl in the wild life it will be difficult to defend itself easily; it might not survive. Support your argument with concrete examples.
Moreover, the animals adopt aggressive behavior that results in them lashing out and injuring or killing people. What does a long essay actually mean? Zoos should not be abolished because they are not only a place for entertainment, they have a significant approach to conservation and helping endangered species, to educating people about environment preservation and for scientific research programs. Second, animals are safe in zoos, as they are treated regularly by experts. Always refer to your handbook for specifics. Breeding programmes provide zoos with good publicity, but in fact most of them are failures. For instance, owls have very fragile bones in their wings. To sum up, after looking at both sides of the debate I pen down by saying that, animals should kept in zoo only because there is no much more place for live them on article missing public place and it would be safe for both people and animals.