If the jury finds the 18 year old kid, as he is referred to throughout the movie, guilty then he… 12 Angry Men Movie Clip Architect From the beginning, the Architect was the only person who believed that there was reasonable doubt, which cause him to stand along. Gradually, the juror wins more and more men over to his side until they finally come to a decision…… Words: 3826 Length: 10 Pages Document Type: Essay Paper : 31281809 Psychosocial Dynamics of Twelve Angry Men Social-Psychology of Twelve Angry Men As a portrayal of a microcosm of society -- enhanced by its drill-down into the 1950s era in which the plot unfolds -- few films are as excruciatingly accurate as 12 Angry Men. Words: 1735 - Pages: 7. In both works of literature, the idea of courage that is being conveyed is the ability to do something that one knows is right or gracious, even though it is extremely difficult. He even says himself that at that point he still believes in the probable guilt of the defendant.
There are many researchers who also support the use of the distributive format of justice for maintaining equality instead of the compensatory format of justice. Despite the similarities that exist across the globe in standards, processes and customers; are these call centers actually catering to the emotional side of this work. I use this strategy on numerous occasions in order to convince these young men and women on why the Army was a great choice. Almost as soon as Mildred was born, her parents ilbert Lee and Deletha Marie Taylor moved to Ohio: part of the great migration of Africa-Americans. His situation is more complicated. There were also some who were biased towards the evidence presented and only chose to reflect.
The main character is juror 8 who is played by Henry Fonda. This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. In the end, Juror 3 could have voted guilty until the end and wait for the hung jury but out of free will, he voted not guilty when he realized that he is defeated and there was nothing more that he can say. He is extremely offended by the comments of juror number ten about people who grew up in his neighborhood. Journal of American College Health, 52 3 :105-111.
What are the stages of group development?. He did not bully the others to come to his conclusions, but he stood firm against the bullying of others who would shut down the discussion just to be done with it. When asked to raise their hands for guilty, some jurors raised theirs right away. The system is based on the idea that it is better for 100 criminals to get away with crime than for one innocent man to go to prison. What makes some decisions easier than others are the values one was raised on that can influence our ultimate decision. Kohlberg's stages can correspond to all of these individuals.
If he is found guilty, he will be sentenced to the electric chair. We are capable of faith, hope and charity, and for that matter, of envy, hated and malice. Only one sees the case differently and is open to considering that there may be reasonable doubt. His fate now lies in the hands of 12 jurors, each with his own determination to solve the case and reveal the truth. He was the first person to suggest that the boy was not guilty. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty.
The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. When he did speak, it was about his ad agency. Firstly, perhaps the most egoistic man seen in the film would be Juror 3. These twelve men must unanimously determine the guilt or innocence of a teenage defendant, whom is charged with the murder of his father. He is not only discriminating based on the ghetto aspect, but also suggests ageism as well. Throughout the play, Rose uses the technique character foil while contrasting juror 3 and juror 8 to demonstrate the message of the play to the audience.
Only one juror is not certain, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the young man is guilty. Yet of those who are convinced that the boy on trial is guilty, all change their vote except one. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. Discrimination pervaded everyday life in the segregated south. They had to learn to work together despite the roles they played to come to a unanimous decision.
He arranged a similar knife and brought brainstorming with the evidences. Other studies that are relevant to this scene have concluded that plays a large role in the success of social influence on conformity, as does the number of subjects involved. It is now up to the twelve men of the jury to decide the fate of the defendant. Petersen still present the dated stereotype of the 50's advertising man? The first one is when some of them deduce that the defendant must have committed the murder since he is from the slums. The case seems clear to many that the boy is guilty of killing his father. We can fall in love, write sonnets or plan for tomorrow. He was not sure about the truth of the evidences at first place and this.
As the session takes its course, evidence becomes scrutinised, tempers rise, and the jury room erupts in a shouting brawl because one such juror finds reasonable doubts in the two testimonies that were deemed credible enough to convict. Marshall plays the stockbroker with glasses, juror number four. A negotiator needs to take note of the common types of behaviors that people exhibit during negotiations when determining how the negotiation will unfold. He initiated most of the conversations that lead to their verdict of not guilty. Ed Begley plays the bigot with a cold, juror number ten.
The fact that he had never been in that situation before gave him no empathy for the way the boy was feeling. Case studies are valuable to any counselor and require much thought and careful consideration. Your task for this assignment is to watch the movie, take note of these various psychological phenomena, and then write a cohesive 2-3 page paper discussing these themes. They all voted again and anonymously and one juror had changed his mind. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case. There is a woman who claimed that she observed the crime act through the windows of a moving train, bearing in mind that she was not wearing her glasses. There aren't any changes made to the key part of the story but yet the minor changes made in making the movie adaptation produce a different picture than what one imagines when reading the drama in the form of a play.